The Joy and Pain of Structural Biology

The British Crystallographic Association is, as its name implies, the main organisation supporting crystallograpy and crystallographers in the UK. Theirs is a multi-disciplinary science, and the different needs of the eclectic group of people who call themselves crystallographers are met by the Association's special interest groups: among them, the Biological Structures Group for structural biology. The annual meeting of this group, known as the Winter Meeting, takes place in December, often just a few working days before Christmas. The BSG Winter Meeting has featured on this blog on several occasions: in 2016, it was held at Birkbeck and celebrated the work of one of our distinguished emeritus professors, Steve Wood.

The 2017 meeting, held in the University of Cambridge's famous Cavendish Laboratory, had a rather unusual theme. The organisers asked each of the invited speakers to talk about the ups and downs of their scientific career - the 'joy and pain' of the meeting title - by focusing on one challenging or important piece of work, perhaps described in a single published paper. Not every speaker managed to keep to just one paper, but all the talks gave useful and at times inspiring insights into how structural biology is done.

First of all, however, Malcolm Longair, head of the Cavendish Laboratory from 1997 to 2005 and perhaps the only astrophysicist to address the Biological Structures Group, gave a short history of the university's Physics department that was based there and its links to structural and molecular biology. That early history was quite extraordinary; many of the most important advances in atomic and nuclear physics, including the discoveries of the electron and the neutron and the first controlled nuclear disintegrations, were made there. A lab photo taken in 1932 includes no fewer than nine Nobel laureates.

Crystallography, in those early years, was thought of as part of physics; J.D. Bernal and his group joined the lab in 1931, and the younger Bragg became head of the department in 1938. The rest, as Longair said, was history: seeds of the discipline we now know as structural molecular biology were sown in Bragg's time with Perutz and Kendrew's work on globin structure as well as Watson and Crick's on that of DNA. By the time those studies reached their triumphant conclusion, however, the crystallographers were no longer strictly part of the Cavendish. The 'Unit for Research on the Molecular Structure of Biological Systems’, set up by the Medical Research Council, moved out of the main lab in 1957 into a building known as the 'MRC Hut'. This was the first home of the MRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology (MRC-LMB) at Cambridge with its enduring reputation for excellent structural biology research.

The next speaker, Cambridge University's Tom Blundell, began by describing his early career in 'the Other Place': Dorothy Hodgkin's lab at Oxford, where he had shared some of the glory of the insulin structure. He had considered talking about insulin at this meeting, but, he explained, "Dorothy had had the pain of trying to solve the structure for 30+ years... I had the joy of a paper in Nature!" The story he told instead was his group's own: solving the structures of proteins involved in DNA repair. This was a long story, taking in 15 years' worth of papers in Nature (2002, 2010) and Science (2017) and culminating in the 'great joy' of discovering inhibitors validated against an important protein target for oncology.

DNA damage taking the form of simultaneous breaks in both DNA strands (double-strand breaks) are common but can lead to cell death or cancer. Fortunately, they are easily repaired in healthy cells, mainly through the mechanism of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Blundell's group have studied the proteins involved in this complex mechanism for many years. It is a three-stage process, in which the component proteins assemble on the DNA molecule either side of the break; the ends are 'pruned' by adding or removing nucleotides to restore the original sequence and finally, the ends are joined through DNA ligation. One of the proteins involved is a kinase, DNA-PKcs, that exists as a single polypeptide chain of 4128 amino acids. Blundell's group published the structure of this huge molecule in 2010 (PDB 3KGV) and it is still the longest single-chain protein to have been solved by X-ray crystallography. Blundell explained that the chain folds into a flexible, circular 'cradle' like structure that can support the DNA double helix, with the ligation taking place inside. The mechanism requires proteins to work as 'stages, scaffolds and steps' to hold the complex together for repair, and his group has solved structures of many other components including the Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer that recognises and binds to the break, initiating the repair, and a nuclease named Artemis with 'a nice pocket for drug discovery'.

Two talks on structural biology as applied to drug discovery followed. The first was by Pamela Williams from Astex Pharmaceuticals, a company founded by Blundell with Harren Jhoti in 1999 that has just registered its first drug - a kinase inhibitor, Kisqali® (ribociclib) - for clinical use in breast cancer. Williams' talk highlighted another protein family that is just as important in pharmacology as the kinases: cytochromes P450. We have about 50 different P450 subtypes in our livers, and they catalyse reactions that modify drug molecules so they can be more easily removed from our bodies. A handful of these - the subtypes known as 1A9, 2C9, 2C19 and 3D6 - metabolise most prescription drugs. Human (and all eukaryotic) P450s are monotopic membrane proteins with flexible active sites, which allow them to bind a wide variety of substrates but which make the structures hard to solve. Williams' involvement with P450 structural biology began with the first mammalian structure, rabbit cytochrome 2C5, and she joined Astex from California to work on the first human structure, the subtype 2C9. This was published in 2003 (PDB 1OG2); a large number of other human structures have followed, yielding useful insights into drug metabolism.

Ben Bax, who studied for his PhD under Tom Blundell at Birkbeck, has just moved to the University of York after eighteen years at the pharma company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). His talk described work at GSK to determine the structures of bacterial DNA gyrases. These are members of a large class of enzymes called topoisomerases that catalyse topological transitions in DNA; the gyrase, which catalyses DNA supercoiling, is the target of the widely used quinolone family of antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin). However, quinolone resistance is increasing, mainly through mutations at specific amino acid positions of the target gyrase. GlaxoSmithKline is investing heavily in the development of novel gyrase inhibitors based on oligonucleotides, and Bax' structural biology group has contributed a large number of still unpublished structures of the enzyme with and without inhibitors or DNA bound to this work.

Janet Thornton, emeritus director of the European Bioinformatics Institute, is one of the best known figures in British bioinformatics. Her talk, on what she termed an 'accidental' paper, took the audience back to the basic principles of protein structure. In the late 70s, when she started her career, there were only about fifteen protein structures known but scientists were already examining those structures to determine characteristic patterns. Many of these first structures determined had major inaccuracies, and discovering and correcting these was a major task for early structural biologists. The Ramachandran Plot, now half a century old, was one of the first tools to be developed to gauge the quality of a protein structure, and it is still widely used. Thornton's 'accidental' (and very highly cited) paper described the program PROCHECK, which runs this and other checks on a structure to give a comprehensive assessment of its quality. A PROCHECK record for each structure in the PDB is linked from the database PDBsum.

The final talk provided delegates with a rare opportunity to hear a new Nobel Laureate - in this case, the Laboratory of Molecular Biology's own Richard Henderson - tell the story behind some of his ground-breaking research. Henderson shared the 2017 Chemistry Nobel, for "developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution", with Joachim Frank and Jacques Dubochet. He chose to talk about one structure that he had in some senses made his own: that of bacteriorhodopsin, a proton pump found in Archaea that captures light energy as photons and that has many structural and mechanistic similarities with the G-protein coupled receptors, although the exact evolutionary relationship is unclear. Henderson's studies of this important molecule started in the 1970s with structures that were just about detailed enough to show the cylindrical helices. It took him over 15 years'effort with collaborators in Berlin, Berkeley and elsewhere to improve the technology enough to solve the so-called 'phase problem' and obtain an atomic-resolution structure by electron diffraction. The rest, again, is history.

Welcome to new PPS students - and blogging crystallography

This post is very like those I have written at the beginning of the academic year for the past few years, if posted rather later than usual. This is because what I have to say now is also very similar...

I would like to offer a warm welcome to the Principles of Protein Structure blog to all students who have recently started studying Birkbeck's Principles of Protein Structure (PPS) course, and a welcome back to any who have taken a break in studies and intend to complete the course this year.

I run this blog to link the material that you will be studying in the course to new research developments in the areas of protein structure and function and related aspects of biotechnology and medicine. I might, example, report on talks given in the ISMB seminar series run jointly by the Department of Biological Sciences at Birkbeck and research departments in neighbouring University College London. The programme for Autumn 2017 focuses on the molecular biology of cancer; there is some material on this topic in section 5 of this course, 'Towards Tertiary Structure', where we look briefly at the structure and function of kinases. Many of the newer anti-cancer drugs, including Glivec, which has transformed the prospects for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia, target this class of protein. Other posts may be reports from conferences or summaries of recently published papers in protein structure and allied areas; watch out for one at the end of this year featuring a lecture by the UK's newest Nobel laureate, Richard Henderson.

Some earlier posts were written by "guest blogger" Jill Faircloth, who took the MSc in Structural Molecular Biology a few years ago and is now working as a freelance science communicator. She introduces herself in this post written in March 2012, in which she also describes how she found the later part of the PPS course and her thoughts on the two choices available for the second year of the MSc.

Do, if you get a chance, look through some blog posts from earlier years to see the kind of topics that we will be discussing. However, don't be discouraged if at this stage of the course you find the science presented there difficult to understand. I can assure you that it will get easier!

And I hope that you will also be interested in some more blogging of mine, in which I explore crystallography - the most popular experimental technique for determining protein structures - more widely. In August I was lucky enough to attend the congress of the International Union of Crystallography in Hyderabad, India, and to write the conference blog. The topics I covered over the 8 days of the meeting ranged from crystallography in history to crystallography in space, but did also include some structural biology. The first post in this series covers the opening ceremony, including the award of one of crystallography's highest honours, the Ewald Prize, to Sir Tom Blundell, a former head of the Department of Crystallography at Birkbeck (now part of the Department of Biological Sciences). Sir Tom is perhaps best known for his part in solving the structure of HIV protease, target of some of the most successful drugs for AIDS, and he went on to found a drug discovery company, Astex. A later post describes a plenary lecture by John Spence of Arizona State University on imaging proteins in motion.

Finally, the best of luck for the 2017-18 PPS course and for your studies at Birkbeck! We hope that many of you will go on to complete our MSc in Structural Molecular Biology.

Best wishes,

Dr Clare Sansom
Senior Associate Lecturer, Biological Sciences, Birkbeck and Tutor, Principles of Protein Structure

Bernal Lecture 2015: Terminating Protein Synthesis

Professor J.D. Bernal, known to his colleagues and contemporaries as ‘Sage’, spent much of his career as a professor of Physics at Birkbeck and became the first chair of the Department of Crystallography in 1963. When he retired in 1968 the college founded a series of lectures in his honour. The first of the Bernal Lectures, in 1969, was given by Dorothy Hodgkin, winner of the 1964 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for solving the structures of ‘important biological substances’, mainly penicillin and vitamin B12. In 2015 we were honoured to welcome another Chemistry Nobel Laureate to give this annual lecture. Professor Sir Venki Ramakrishnan of the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge was awarded the prize in 2009 with Thomas Steitz of Yale University, USA and Ada Yonath of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel, for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome: the ‘molecular machine’ that catalyses the synthesis of proteins from their messenger RNA (mRNA) templates.

The lecture, held on 19 October 2015, was introduced by David Latchman, Master of Birkbeck College and Professor of Genetics. He welcomed three generations of Bernal’s descendants to Birkbeck, highlighted the success of the lecture series in attracting some of the most distinguished researchers in structural biology and allied disciplines, and explained that the topic of the lecture overlapped with some of his own research interests in the regulation of gene expression.

Prof. Ramakrishnan began his lecture by explaining that protein synthesis was a complex process, involving many proteins as well as the ribosome itself, and that he would be talking about a particular point in this process: namely, how it ends (formally, the termination of protein translation). He showed an image of a ribosome in the process of protein synthesis that, he explained, represented the culmination of 40 years’ work on its structure, and explained how the linear mRNA molecule wound through a cleft between the two subunits of the ribosome. As the mRNA passes through the ribosome each of its three-base ‘codons’ comes into contact with three sub-parts of the ribosome’s active site – the A-site, P-site and E-site – in turn. When a codon enters the A-site it binds to the anti-codon of the transfer RNA (tRNA) carrying the next amino acid; the amino acid is bonded to the previous amino acid in the growing protein chain in the P-site, and the now empty tRNA released from the ribosome in the E-site. This continues until the new protein chain is complete. This is signalled by one of the so-called ‘stop codons’ UGA, UAG and UAA, which have no corresponding tRNAs, entering the ribosome’s A-site. The new protein is released from the ribosome to fold into its native structure, and the ribosome subunits dissociate.

Diagram of a ribosome showing the three tRNA binding sites during protein elongation
Taken from the PDB ‘Structural View of Biology: The Ribosome’
© David Goodsell, 2010

Although the process of adding amino acids to a protein chain is extremely similar in all organisms, there are significant differences between bacteria (prokaryotes) and eukaryotes in the process of termination – as, indeed, there are in the initiation of protein synthesis. We are beginning to understand these mechanisms only now that we can obtain high resolution structures of ‘snapshots’ of the ribosome at different points during the protein synthesis cycle and follow the sequence of conformational changes that occur then.

All stop codons are recognised and decoded by proteins known as a release factors. Bacteria have two of these: RF1 recognises UAG, RF2 recognises UGA and they both recognise UAA. Eukaryotes have only one RF, which can recognise all these codons. These three proteins all have a common sequence motif, GGQ, which is known to be involved in the release of the protein from the ribosome. The structures of the eukaryotic and prokaryotic release factors are different, but all bind to the ribosome in such a way that the GGQ motif and the part of the structure that recognises the stop codon are exactly the same distance apart as the length of a tRNA molecule. These parts of the protein will therefore interact with the peptide and the stop codon at the same time.

Prof. Ramakrishnan and his group spent years trying to obtain near atomic resolution structures of functional ribosome-release factor complexes; this problem was solved initially for the smaller prokaryotic ribosomes but now for eukaryotic ones as well. In all cases, the release factors bind to the ribosome in a different way to the tRNA molecules, inducing a different conformational change in the complex. Using the bacterial structures, the group was able to understand why the factors RF1 and RF2 only recognise the codons that they do.

In the case of eukaryotes, not only were the structures harder to obtain, but the basic question to be asked was more complex: how can a single protein recognise the stop codons UGA, UAG and UAA, but not UGG (which codes for the amino acid tryptophan)? Ramakrishnan reasoned that mutating the GGQ motif in the release factor would make it inactive, and that binding this mutant protein to the ribosome with an ATPase might ‘trap’ the complex in the structure that it takes up before protein is released and allow the structure to be determined. Electron micrographs of these structures have shown that the three anti-codons and no others are recognised through a combination of base stacking and hydrogen bonding. Ramakrishnan ended his talk by comparing anti-codon binding to a NAND gate in electronics, with G representing ‘1’ and A ‘0’: any combination except GG (‘11’) in the second and third anti-codon positions leads to termination of translation and protein release.

This work was published in Nature in August 2015 and the (very large!) structures of the complexes – one snapshot with the release factor bound in each of the ribosome subsites – are available in the PDB as entries 3JAG,3JAH and 3JAI. These are some of the most recent of the 103 PDB structures on which Prof Ramakrishnan has so far been named as an author; you can view them all on a timeline on the PDB site.

Note: If you are reading this blog post as a current PPS student, don’t be surprised if you find it difficult to understand. We will cover the structure and mechanism of the ribosome later in the course (in Section 8: The Protein Lifecycle). If you bookmark this blog post and come back to it after you have studied that section you should find that you can make much more out of it.

Welcome to PPS students 2015-16!

This post is extremely like those I have written at this time of year for the past few years. This is because what I have to say now is very, very similar...

I would like to offer a warm welcome to the Principles of Protein Structure blog to all students who have just started studying Birkbeck's Principles of Protein Structure (PPS) course, and a welcome back to any who have taken a break in studies and intend to complete the course this year.

I run this blog to link the material that you will be studying in the course to new research developments in the areas of protein structure and function and related aspects of biotechnology and medicine. I might, example, report on talks given in the ISMB seminar series run jointly by the Department of Biological Sciences at Birkbeck and research departments in neighbouring University College London. The programme for Autumn 2015 focuses on transcription, which is the process through which DNA is copied into RNA; this will be covered in some detail in one of the later sections of the course, the Protein Lifecycle. Other posts may be reports from conferences or summaries of recently published papers in protein structure, protein bioinformatics and allied areas. Look out for an account of a lecture to be given at Birkbeck in October by Venki Ramakrishnan, who was awarded a share of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 2009 for structural studies of ribosomes and will shortly take over as President of the Royal Society.

Some posts on this blog are written by "guest blogger" Jill Faircloth, who took the MSc in Structural Molecular Biology a few years ago and is now working as a freelance science communicator. She introduces herself in this post written in March 2012, in which she also describes how she found the later part of the PPS course and her thoughts on the two choices available for the second year of the MSc.

Do, if you get a chance, look through some blog posts from earlier years to see the kind of topics that we will be discussing. However, don't be discouraged if at this stage of the course you find the science presented there difficult to understand. I can assure you that it will get easier!

I particularly recommend that you look at a couple of posts from December 2013 and July 2014 about the history of structural science, particularly X-ray crystallography. Crystallography was the first method to be developed for solving the structure of biological macromolecules, and it is still the most important. The year 2014 was designated by the United Nations as the International Year of Crystallography, marking the year between the centenaries of the publication of the first papers on X-ray diffraction and the award of the 1915 Nobel Prize for Physics to the father-and-son team of William and Lawrence Bragg who made the principal discoveries.

So - the best of luck for the 2015-16 PPS course and for your studies at Birkbeck! We hope that many of you will go on to complete our MSc in Structural Molecular Biology.

Best wishes,

Dr Clare Sansom Senior Associate Lecturer, Biological Sciences, Birkbeck and Tutor, Principles of Protein Structure

Welcome to PPS students 2014-15!

This post is extremely like those I have written at this time of year for the past few years. This is because what I have to say now is very, very similar...

I would like to offer a warm welcome to the Principles of Protein Structure blog to all students who have just started studying Birkbeck's Principles of Protein Structure course, and a welcome back to any who have taken a break in studies and intend to complete the course this year.

I run this blog to link the material that you will be studying in the course to new research developments in the areas of protein structure and function and related aspects of biotechnology and medicine. Throughout the taught course (but more often in the later part of the course) I will post reports of recent developments. I might, example, report on talks given in the ISMB seminar series run jointly by the Department of Biological Sciences at Birkbeck and research departments in neighbouring University College London. The overall title of the programme for Autumn 2014 is Synthetic Biology: an innovative and important topic that relates quite closely to some of the material we cover in the later sections of the course, particularly the sections on Bioinformatics and the Protein Lifecycle. Other posts may be reports from conferences or summaries of recently published papers in protein structure, protein bioinformatics and allied areas.

Some of the posts on this blog are written by "guest blogger" Jill Faircloth, who took the MSc in Structural Molecular Biology a few years ago and is now working as a freelance science communicator. She introduces herself in this post written in March 2012, in which she also describes how she found the later part of the PPS course and her thoughts on the two choices available for the second year of the MSc.

Do, if you get a chance, look through some of the earlier blog posts to see the kind of topics that we will be discussing. However, don't be discouraged if at this stage of the course you find the science presented there difficult to understand. I can assure you that it will get easier!

I particularly recommend that you look at a couple of posts from last academic year - December 2013 and July 2014 - about the history of structural science, particularly X-ray crystallography. Crystallography was the first method to be developed for solving the structure of biological macromolecules, and it is still the most important. The year 2014 was designated by the United Nations as the International Year of Crystallography, marking the year between the centenaries of the publication of the first papers on X-ray diffraction and the award of the 1915 Nobel Prize for Physics to the father-and-son team of William and Lawrence Bragg who made the principal discoveries. The International Year has been marked by a wide range of activities, special symposia, publications, "open labs" and even postage stamps, and there are still a few events planned.

So - the best of luck for the 2014-15 PPS course and for your studies at Birkbeck! We hope that many of you will go on to complete our MSc in Structural Molecular Biology.

Best wishes,

Dr Clare Sansom Senior Associate Lecturer, Biological Sciences, Birkbeck and Tutor, Principles of Protein Structure

Science Week 2014: Birkbeck and the History of Crystallography

Science Week at Birkbeck in 2014 featured two lectures on Department of Biological Sciences, both presented on 2 July. One of these was a double act from two distinguished emeritus professors and Fellows of the College, Paul Barnes and David Moss. Remarkably, they both started their working lives at Birkbeck on the same day – 1 October 1968 – and so had clocked up over 90 years of service to the college between them by Science Week 2014.

The topic they took was a timely one: the history of the science of crystallography over the past 100 years. UNESCO has declared 2014 to be the International Year of Crystallography in recognition of the seminal discoveries that started the discipline, which were made almost exactly 100 years ago; a number of the most important discoveries of that century were made by scientists with links to Birkbeck.

The presenters divided the “century of crystallography” into two, with Barnes speaking first and covering the first 50 years. In giving his talk the title “A History of Modern Crystallography”, however, he recognised that crystals have been observed, admired and studied for many centuries. What changed at the beginning of the last century was the discovery of X-ray diffraction. Wilhelm Röntgen was awarded the first-ever Nobel Prize for Physics for his discovery of X-rays in 1896, but it was almost two decades before anyone thought of directing them at crystals. The breakthroughs came when Max von Laue showed that a beam of X-rays can be diffracted by a crystal to yield a pattern of spots, and the father-and-son team of William Henry and William Lawrence Bragg showed that it was possible to derive information about the atomic structure of crystals from their diffraction patterns. These discoveries also solved – to some extent – the debate about whether X-rays were particles or waves, as only waves diffract; we now know that all electromagnetic radiation, including X-rays, can be thought of as both particles and waves

Von Laue and the Braggs were awarded Nobel Prizes for Physics in 1914 and 1915 respectively, and between 1916 and 1964 no fewer than 13 more Nobel Prizes were awarded to 18 more scientists for discoveries related to crystallography. Petrus Debye, who won the Chemistry prize in 1936, showed how to quantify the thermal motion of atoms as vibrations within a crystal. He also invented one of the first powder diffraction cameras, used to obtain diffraction patterns from powders of tiny crystallites. Another Nobel Laureate, Percy Bridgman, studied the structures of materials under pressure: it has been said that he would “squeeze anything he could lay his hands on”, often up to intense pressures.

Scientists and scientific commentators often argue about which of their colleagues would have most deserved to win the ultimate accolade. Barnes named three who, he said, could easily have been Nobel Laureates in the field of crystallography. One, Paul Ewald, was a theoretical physicist who had studied for his PhD under von Laue in Munich, and the other two had strong links with Birkbeck. JD “Sage” Bernal was Professor of Physics and then of Crystallography here; he was famous for obtaining, with Dorothy Crowfoot (later Hodgkin) the first diffraction pattern from a protein crystal, but his insights into the atomic basis of the very different properties of carbon as diamond and as graphite were perhaps even more remarkable. He took on Rosalind Franklin, whose diffraction patterns of DNA had led Watson and Crick to deduce its double helical structure, after she left King’s College, and she did pioneering work on virus structure here until her premature death in 1958.

Barnes ended his talk and led into Moss’s second half-century with a discussion of similarities between the earliest crystallography and today, as now, you only need three things to obtain a diffraction pattern: a source of X-rays, a crystalline sample, and a recording device; the differences all lie in the power and precision of the equipment used. He demonstrated this with a “symbolic demo” that ended when he pulled a model structure of a zeolite out of a large cardboard box.

Paul Barnes demonstrates the basic principles of X-ray crystallography using a large cardboard box. Photo © Harish Patel and Ruben Zamora, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck

David Moss then took over to describe some of the most important crystallographic discoveries from the last half-century. His talk concentrated on the structures of large biological molecules, particularly proteins, and he began by explaining the importance of protein structure. All the chemistry that is necessary for life is controlled by proteins, and knowing the structure of proteins enables us to understand, and potentially also to modify, how they work.

Even the smallest proteins contain thousands of atoms; in order to determine the position of all the atoms in a protein using crystallography you need to make an enormous number of measurements of the positions and intensities of X-ray spots. The process of solving the structure of a protein is no different from that of solving a small molecule crystal structure, but it is more complex and takes much more time. Very briefly, it involves crystallising the protein; shining an intense beam of X-rays on the resulting crystals to produce diffraction patterns, and then doing some extremely complex calculations. The first protein structures, obtained without the benefit of automation and modern computers, took many years and sometimes even decades.

Thanks to Bernal’s genius, energy and pioneering spirit, Birkbeck was one of the first institutes in the UK to have all the equipment that was needed for crystallography. This included some of the country’s first “large” computers. One of the first electronic stored-program computers was developed in Donald Booth’s laboratory here in the 1950s. In the mid-1960s the college had an ATLAS computer with a total memory of 96 kB. It occupied the basements of two houses in Gordon Square, and crystallographers used it to calculate electron density maps of small molecules. Protein crystallography only “took off” in the 1970s with further improvements in computing and automation of much of the experimental technique.

Today, protein crystallography can almost be said to be routine. The first step, crystallising the protein, can still be an important bottleneck, but data collection at powerful synchrotron X-ray sources is extremely rapid and structures can be solved quite easily with user-friendly software that runs on ordinary laptops. There are now over 100,000 protein structures freely available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), and about 90% of these were obtained using X-ray crystallography. The techniques used to obtain the other 10,000 or so, nuclear magnetic resonance and electron microscopy, are more specialised.

Moss ended his talk by describing one of the proteins solved in his group during his long career at Birkbeck: a bacterial toxin that is responsible for the disease gas gangrene (PDB 1CA1). This destroys muscle cells by punching holes in their membranes, and its victims usually have to have limbs amputated to save their lives. Knowing the structure has allowed scientists to understand how this toxin works, which is the first step towards developing drugs to stop it. But you can learn even more about how proteins work if you also understand how they move. Observing and modelling protein motion in “real time” still poses many challenges for scientists as the second century of crystallography begins.

Structure of alpha-toxin, the key Clostridium perfringen toxin in gas gangrene. Image from the PDB.

A Very Short History of Crystallography

You might possibly have been intrigued to read in my last post that 2014 has been designated as the International Year of Crystallography. This year was chosen to celebrate the fact that this discipline - the study of atomic and molecular structure through their crystal forms - is now almost exactly a hundred years old. Admittedly, the first paper in the discipline, rather charmingly titled just "The diffraction of short electro-magnetic waves by a crystal" was published in 1913, and the Nobel Prize awarded two years later, but 2014 is at least a good compromise.

It can be said, perhaps simplistically, that crystallography was invented by the father-and-son team of William Henry and William Lawrence (known as Lawrence) Bragg, at the Universities of Leeds and Cambridge in the UK. The Braggs, however, did not aim to found a new discipline or even to investigate the atomic properties of matter. They were more interested in solving a problem that had been puzzling the cleverest physicists in the world for almost two decades. X-rays had been discovered by Wilhelm Rőntgen in Germany in 1895, but their very name (the unknown X) suggests reveals their controversial nature. Were they particles or waves?

The older Bragg, William, was convinced that X-rays were particles, and set out to prove this to his son (who favoured the wave theory) by exploiting the discovery of another German physicist, von Laue, that X-rays shone at a crystal were scattered and could produce a pattern on a film. Lawrence was the first to realise that these patterns could be explained by the theory that the X-rays were reflected from planes of atoms in the crystal and interfered with each other.

Lawrence presented these results to the Cambridge Philosophical Society late in 1912 and published them in the paper mentioned above the following year. This paper also included the first formulation of one of the best known of all laws of physics: Bragg's Law. This relates the wavelength of incoming X-rays and the angles that they are scattered (diffracted) to the spacing between planes of atoms in a crystal, enabling scientists to determine the geometry of atomic crystal lattices.

The Braggs worked together in Leeds and published their first structures, including that of sodium chloride (common salt) before Lawrence was sent to France to fight in the First World War. He was in the trenches when he heard that he and his father had been awarded the 1915 Nobel Prize for Physics; that news reached him shortly after that of the death of his brother Robert. At only 25, he was (and still remains) the youngest ever recipient of a Nobel Prize.

Technical advances between the wars enabled scientists working in this new discipline to solve the structures of rather more complex molecules. Kathleen Lansdale, one many women who began their research careers as the Braggs' students, solved the structures of benzene derivatives and was the first to see that aromatic rings were flat. And two later developments paved the way for the explosion in structural science that characterised the later twentieth century. In 1934, John Desmond (J.D.) Bernal, who later became the first head of the School of Crystallography at Birkbeck (the predecessor department of our Biological Sciences) and his student Dorothy Crowfoot (later Hodgkin) obtained the first X-ray diffraction patterns from protein crystals. And in the following year Lindo Patterson developed a function that greatly simplified the mathematics involved in structure determination.

Even fifty years ago however, solving crystal structures was a long and at times tedious business. A typical crystallogaphy PhD thesis of the 1960s or 1970s would contain the structures of maybe three small or medium-sized molecules. It is now possible to generate as many in a few hours, so it is possible to see clearly how structures of molecules respond to changes in conditios such as temperature and pressure.

All these discoveries have been made possible by advances in technology, and particularly by the development of synchrotron radiation as a source of powerful beams of X-rays. Synchrotron radiation is produced when charged particles are accelerated radially, and synchrotrons built primarily as X-ray sources were first built in the 1980s. The UK's synchrotron, Diamond at Harwell in Oxfordshire, is currently the fifth largest in the world. It has 23 separate "beamlines", each providing a beam of X-rays with properties that have been optimised for a particular experimental technique.

Synchrotrons provide facilities for solving structures from single crystals of large and small molecules, including, of course, proteins, and from micro-crystalline samples (the latter technique is known as powder diffraction). Although structural biology attracts much of the attention (see almost all the other posts on this blog) structures of smaller molecules can still provide important insights. Sandy Blake, a crystallographer at the University of Nottingham, is using Diamond beamlines to solve the structures of novel materials called metal-organic frameworks or MOFs that are able to store gases including hydrogen (which is a potential fuel source) and greenhouse gases.

At 100, crystallography is still a young discipline but it has radically transformed many other areas of science and, through them, the world we inhabit today. This has been reflected in decisions made by the Nobel committees over the decades. The International Union of Crystallography maintains a list of Nobels awarded for ‘achievements directly related to, or involving the use of, crystallography’. There are now 29 of these, and the latest year with no crystallography-related Nobel was 2008. Even the 2013 Chemistry prize, awarded to Martin Karplus, Michael Levitt and Arieh Warshel, appears on the list: their discipline of computational chemistry would be impossible without structural knowledge obtained through crystallography.

And it almost goes without saying that protein structure, and structural biology more generally - the disciplines taught in this course and its associated MSc - owe their existence to the development of X-ray crystallography.

This blog post is based on an article I wrote for the Royal Society of Chemistry's membership journal, Chemistry World. It will be published in the January 2014 issue of the journal.

Welcome to PPS Students 2013-14!

This post is very like one I wrote at exactly this time last year. This is because what I have to say now is very, very similar...

I would like to offer a warm welcome to the Principles of Protein Structure blog to all students who have just started studying Birkbeck's Principles of Protein Structure course!

I run this blog to link the material that you will be studying in the course to new research developments in the areas of protein structure and function and related aspects of biotechnology and medicine. Throughout the taught course (but more often in the later part of the course) I will post reports of recent developments. I might, example, report on talks given in the ISMB seminar series run jointly by the Department of Biological Sciences at Birkbeck and research departments in neighbouring University College London. The overall title of the programme for Autumn 2013 is Molecular Mechanisms of Intracellular Trafficking: an important topic that relates quite closely to some of the material we cover in the later sections of the course. Other posts may be reports from conferences or summaries of recently published papers in protein structure, protein bioinformatics and allied areas.

And one topic that you are bound to hear more of on this blog, particularly after the New Year, is the history of structural science, particularly X-ray crystallography. Crystallography was the first method to be developed for solving the structure of biological macromolecules, and it is still the most important. The United Nations has designated 2014 as the International Year of Crystallography - the date is between the centenaries of the publication of the first papers on X-ray diffraction and the award of the 1915 Nobel Prize for Physics to the father-and-son team of William and Lawrence Bragg who made the principal discoveries.

Some of the posts on this blog are written by "guest blogger" Jill Faircloth, who took the MSc in Structural Molecular Biology a few years ago and is now working as a freelance science communicator. She introduces herself in this post written in March 2012, in which she also describes how she found the later part of the PPS course and her thoughts on the two choices available for the second year of the MSc.

Do, if you get a chance, look through some of the earlier blog posts to see the kind of topics that we will be discussing. However, don't be discouraged if at this stage of the course you find the science presented there difficult to understand. I can assure you that it will get easier!

And the best of luck for the 2013-14 PPS course and for your studies at Birkbeck! We hope that many of you will go on to complete our MSc in Structural Molecular Biology.

Best wishes,

Dr Clare Sansom
Senior Associate Lecturer, Biological Sciences, Birkbeck and Tutor, Principles of Protein Structure

From Genome to Proteome: BCA Winter Meeting 2012

The British Crystallographic Association is the main UK organisation supporting the science of crystallography in all its forms. Every year, its Biological Structures Group holds a meeting in the run-up to Christmas to discuss and celebrate recent developments in structural biology research. In 2012, this Winter Meeting was held at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the University of Cambridge.

The LMB, as it is usually known, is one of the birthplaces of modern structural and molecular biology. It moved into its current building in 1962, the year when four of its most famous scientists were awarded two Nobel Prizes for some of the most important discoveries in twentieth-century biology: James Watson and Francis Crick or the structure of DNA, and Max Perutz and John Kendrew for the very first three-dimensional structures of proteins (myoglobin and haemoglobin, respectively).

It was appropriate, therefore, that the theme of this year's Winter Meeting was "From Genome to Proteome". The basic molecular processes that underlie all of life - DNA replication, transcription of DNA into RNA and translation of RNA into protein - are all, now, quite well understood. These processes are all very complicated and require numerous proteins, many of which interact together to form complexes and "molecular machines" that are quite large, at least in molecular terms. Scientists presenting at the meeting discussed recent, innovative studies of the structures of many of these proteins and the nucleic acids that they interact with. Many of these processes will be discussed in some detail in section 8 of the PPS course, "The Protein Lifecycle".

The meeting programme was divided into three sections, corresponding respectively to DNA synthesis and repair, RNA transcription and protein translation.

DNA Replication and Repair

DNA synthesis and repair are not even mentioned in the famous Central Dogma of Molecular Biology (put very simplistically, DNA makes RNA makes protein) but they are, of course, essential for it. The first speaker in this session, and therefore in the meeting as a whole, was Luca Pellegrini from the University of Cambridge. He described structural studies of the first part of this process: the initiation of DNA synthesis. In all organisms, this process involves an enzyme called primase, which is found at the DNA replication fork - the point at which the strands of the original DNA helix divide so that a new strand can be synthesised on each of the template strands. Pellegrini and his group have solved the structure of several of the subunits of yeast primase, alone and bound to part of the DNA polymerase Pol alpha, and are using these structures to deduce the precise mechanism of this vitally important process.

Then Neil Kad of the University of Essex described the techniques he has developed for visualising individual molecules, and how he is applying them to the study of DNA repair by nucleotide excision. Briefly, this technique involves stretching a single molecule of DNA between two positively charged silica beads, and tagging individual molecules of DNA-binding proteins using fluorescent quantum dots so that their binding to and progress along this DNA "tightrope" can be monitored. He has discovered that although single subunits of the Uvr DNA repair protein complex may bind DNA and search it for errors, a complex between the subunits UvrA and UvrB is required for quick and efficient searching.

Schematic diagram of a "DNA tightrope" with labelled proteins bound. (c) Neil Kad, from the Kad Lab homepage

Transcription

The spliceosome is a "molecular machine" comprised of protein and small nuclear RNA (snRNA) subunits that found only in eukaryotes and that catalyses the removal of introns from the messenger RNA precursor molecules that are initially transcribed from DNA. Chris Oubridge, a member of Kiyoshi Nagai's group at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge (and therefore one of the "home team") described an atomic resolution structure of a complex known as U1 that forms a major part of the soliceosome. This "small nuclear ribonucleoprotein" (snRNP) comprises the snRNA molecule U1 bound to ten proteins. This technically challenging exercise in X-ray crystallography is yielding important insights into the function and mechanism of this important part of the spliceosome.

Structure of the U1 ribonucleoprotein, from Kiyoshi Nagai's web pages at the MRC-LMB.

Another interesting presentation in the Translation section was given by David Lilley from the University of Dundee, who described the structures of kink turns in RNA molecules, and how these structural motifs interact with proteins.

Translation

Since the modern Laboratory o Molecular Biology was constituted as the "Unit for Research on the Molecular Structure of Biological Systems'" in 1947, nine Nobel prizes have been awarded to scientists working there. Its most recent laureate, Venki Ramakrishnan, shared the 2009 chemistry prize with Tom Steitz from the US and Ada Yonath from Israel for determining the first atomic resolution structure of the ribosome. Israel Sanchez from Ramakrishnan's lab at the LMB gave a presentation on the mechanism by which stop codons, which give the signal to terminate protein synthesis, are decoded on the ribosome. This process, which occurs when one of the stop codons (UAA, UAG and UGA in the standard genetic code) binds to the ribosomal A site, is still less well understood than the process through which "sense" codons are decoded into amino acids. Sanchez and his colleagues are studying the structure and function of ribosomes bound to modified RNA in which the uridine in the first position of a stop codon has been substituted by pseudo-uridine. They have discovered that the decoding centre of the ribosome is more flexible than they had originally thought, an insight that may help the understanding of the termination of protein synthesis further.

The final speaker was Birkbeck's own Cara Vaughan. She discussed some of her recent research using a combination of X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy to decipher the assembly of the kinetochore. This is a structure that forms in eukaryotic cells during cell division and that links the dividing chromosome to the mitotic spindle. Vaughan's research concerns a protein called Hsp90 that activates many signalling proteins. This protein is a member of a class of proteins termed the chaperones, which are generically involved in the folding, unfolding and activation of other proteins. Vaughan and her co-workers have solved the structure of two interacting proteins found in yeast, Sgt1 and Skp1, which togethe3r seem to hold Hsp90 in an open conformation that enables other kinetochore proteins to bind.

Image of a dividing eukaryotic cell. The chromosomes are shown in blue, the microtubules of the mitotic spindle in green, and the kinetochores in pink. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

The annual Winter Meeting is the most high profile event organised by the Biological Structures Group of BCA. The association as a whole organises many other events, including, this year, the annual European Crystallographic Meeting. ECM 28 will be held at the University of Warwick from 25-29 August 2013; it will provide an opportunity for British and European crystallographers to celebrate the origin of their science with the discovery of X-ray diffraction by father and son William Henry and William Lawrence Bragg, almost exactly a hundred years ago.