Rosalind Franklin Lecture 2018: Eva Nogales, electron microscopist

Since 2016, Birkbeck has held an annual lecture named in honour of perhaps the most famous woman scientist ever to work there: Rosalind Franklin, whose extraordinary, meticulous experimental work was a necessary part of solving the structure of DNA. This lecture is part of Birkbeck’s commitment to the Athena SWAN equality initiative, and is it given by a woman scientist distinguished in one of the disciplines represented there.

The 2018 lecture differed from its predecessors in forming part of both Birkbeck’s annual Science Week and the eighth ISMB Symposium. The Institute of Structural Molecular Biology (ISMB) is a centre of excellence, founded in 2003 to promote and integrate multi-disciplinary research in molecular, cell and structural biology in Birkbeck and its much larger neighbour, UCL. It holds a varied programme of events for faculty members, research staff and students; symposia, held in ‘even years’, are intensive conferences, generally held over two days and featuring talks from international research leaders.

This symposium was held over two afternoons on Monday 18 and Tuesday 19 June, with the Rosalind Franklin lecture as the last one on the first day. In planning the symposium, its organisers chose to highlight one technique among all those available for researchers at the ISMB: electron microscopy, as used to study the atomic structures of large protein complexes and ‘molecular machines’. The Institute’s director, Gabriel Waksman, highlighted Birkbeck’s acquisition of a new and very powerful electron microscope – a Titan Krios – in his introduction as ‘something to celebrate’. According to the School of Science Facebook page, Birkbeck’s Department of Biological Sciences is the smallest UK university department to house such a powerful microscope, and it is only through the ISMB that it is able to punch so far above its weight. And the Rosalind Franklin lecturer, Eva Nogales from the University of California in Berkeley, was only one of several distinguished proponents of this technique to present their research during the symposium.

Eva Nogales with Prof. Nicholas Keep, Dean of the Faculty of Science at Birkbeck. Photo © Harish Patel, Birkbeck

Few women have achieved as much in electron microscopy research as Nogales. Following a short introduction by Professor Nicholas Keep, Dean of the Faculty of Science at Birkbeck, she began her Rosalind Franklin lecture with thanks. She paid tribute to two of the distinguished researchers present, Helen Saibil and Ken Holmes, describing Saibil, the Bernal Professor of Structural Biology at Birkbeck, as an ‘inspirational’ pioneering woman in electron microscopy. Holmes, who had given one of the previous talks at the symposium, worked with Rosalind Franklin as a PhD student at Birkbeck in the 1950s and went on to make ground-breaking discoveries about the structure of the muscle protein, actin.

Nogales’ main theme during her lecture was her lab’s efforts to decipher the structures of several large, multi-protein complexes that are involved in the process of gene expression. The different types of cells in our bodies – with a few odd exceptions, such as cancer cells – all contain exactly the same DNA in the chromosomes in the cell nucleus. What makes a brain cell differ from a bone cell or a heart call is how the information carried by the genes on those chromosomes is expressed in the functional molecules, mainly proteins. Only a fraction of the genes in a genome are expressed in a given cell at any particular time. Gene expression is the term given to this incredibly complex and exquisitely sensitive process, which can be divided into two stages expressed simplistically as ‘DNA to RNA’ and ‘RNA to protein’. Work in the Nogales lab focuses on two protein complexes that are involved in the first sub-process, the transcription of the DNA sequences of genes into RNA. These bear the rather cumbersome names of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and transcription factor II D (TFIID).

If the DNA in each human chromosome could be stretched out it would measure tens of centimetres in length. It is packed and compressed to fit into the microscopic cell nucleus by winding around histone proteins to form circular units of structure called nucleosomes. Proteins in the ‘transcription machinery’ can only access the DNA to start gene expression if these are loosely packed. PRC2, as its full name implies, represses this process: it does so by adding methyl groups to the alkaline lysine residues of the histones, making the nucleosomes pack more tightly together. The protein complex therefore forms an ‘on-off switch’ for gene expression. Disrupting its function can lead to the uncontrolled cell growth and multiplication that is characteristic of cancer cells and it is therefore a useful target for the design of anti-cancer drugs.

Nogales explained that PRC2 is a very large protein complex and that determining its structure using electron microscopy presented a considerable challenge. The first structures, obtained before the ‘resolution revolution’ in this technique, could only show separate protein molecules as ‘blobs’: later, better structures that revealed the positions of individual atoms proved that these were ‘accurate but not very precise’. The complex is now known to exist in several distinct structural states and to be able to add methyl groups (‘active’) in two of them. The main difference between these is in the position of one helix, which is bent against the rest of the molecule in the ‘compact active’ conformation but straightens away from it in the ‘extended active’ one. PRC2 binds to two protein co-factors in ways that mimic the binding of the flexible ‘tails’ of the histone proteins in methylated and unmethylated forms respectively.

She then showed some even more impressive structures to explain how the complex interacts with nucleosomes. One complex binds between a pair of nucleosomes, and as long as the DNA that links the two is the right length, binding the first nucleosome positions the second so that the right amino acids are brought into the right position in the PCR2 active site for methylation to occur efficiently.

The second complex discussed, TFIID, is active exactly when PRC2 is not, as its presence is necessary to begin the process through which DNA is transcribed into RNA. This begins with the step-by-step assembly of proteins close to the position on the DNA where transcription is due to start, forming a ‘preinitiation complex’. TFIID is the first component of this complex to assemble, and this ‘nucleates’ the complex by recruiting other transcription factors so RNA synthesis can begin. Nogales described distinctive structures of parts of the preinitiation complex obtained by members of her group, finishing by showing some unpublished work on its structure and dynamics that included this vital component. If this fascinating lecture has inspired the many young electron microscopists in the audience as much as Helen Saibil’s work inspired Nogales, then the future of the discipline will be in good – and often female – hands.

This has been cross-posted with minimal alterations from Birkbeck's Events Blog

The Joy and Pain of Structural Biology

The British Crystallographic Association is, as its name implies, the main organisation supporting crystallograpy and crystallographers in the UK. Theirs is a multi-disciplinary science, and the different needs of the eclectic group of people who call themselves crystallographers are met by the Association's special interest groups: among them, the Biological Structures Group for structural biology. The annual meeting of this group, known as the Winter Meeting, takes place in December, often just a few working days before Christmas. The BSG Winter Meeting has featured on this blog on several occasions: in 2016, it was held at Birkbeck and celebrated the work of one of our distinguished emeritus professors, Steve Wood.

The 2017 meeting, held in the University of Cambridge's famous Cavendish Laboratory, had a rather unusual theme. The organisers asked each of the invited speakers to talk about the ups and downs of their scientific career - the 'joy and pain' of the meeting title - by focusing on one challenging or important piece of work, perhaps described in a single published paper. Not every speaker managed to keep to just one paper, but all the talks gave useful and at times inspiring insights into how structural biology is done.

First of all, however, Malcolm Longair, head of the Cavendish Laboratory from 1997 to 2005 and perhaps the only astrophysicist to address the Biological Structures Group, gave a short history of the university's Physics department that was based there and its links to structural and molecular biology. That early history was quite extraordinary; many of the most important advances in atomic and nuclear physics, including the discoveries of the electron and the neutron and the first controlled nuclear disintegrations, were made there. A lab photo taken in 1932 includes no fewer than nine Nobel laureates.

Crystallography, in those early years, was thought of as part of physics; J.D. Bernal and his group joined the lab in 1931, and the younger Bragg became head of the department in 1938. The rest, as Longair said, was history: seeds of the discipline we now know as structural molecular biology were sown in Bragg's time with Perutz and Kendrew's work on globin structure as well as Watson and Crick's on that of DNA. By the time those studies reached their triumphant conclusion, however, the crystallographers were no longer strictly part of the Cavendish. The 'Unit for Research on the Molecular Structure of Biological Systems’, set up by the Medical Research Council, moved out of the main lab in 1957 into a building known as the 'MRC Hut'. This was the first home of the MRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology (MRC-LMB) at Cambridge with its enduring reputation for excellent structural biology research.

The next speaker, Cambridge University's Tom Blundell, began by describing his early career in 'the Other Place': Dorothy Hodgkin's lab at Oxford, where he had shared some of the glory of the insulin structure. He had considered talking about insulin at this meeting, but, he explained, "Dorothy had had the pain of trying to solve the structure for 30+ years... I had the joy of a paper in Nature!" The story he told instead was his group's own: solving the structures of proteins involved in DNA repair. This was a long story, taking in 15 years' worth of papers in Nature (2002, 2010) and Science (2017) and culminating in the 'great joy' of discovering inhibitors validated against an important protein target for oncology.

DNA damage taking the form of simultaneous breaks in both DNA strands (double-strand breaks) are common but can lead to cell death or cancer. Fortunately, they are easily repaired in healthy cells, mainly through the mechanism of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Blundell's group have studied the proteins involved in this complex mechanism for many years. It is a three-stage process, in which the component proteins assemble on the DNA molecule either side of the break; the ends are 'pruned' by adding or removing nucleotides to restore the original sequence and finally, the ends are joined through DNA ligation. One of the proteins involved is a kinase, DNA-PKcs, that exists as a single polypeptide chain of 4128 amino acids. Blundell's group published the structure of this huge molecule in 2010 (PDB 3KGV) and it is still the longest single-chain protein to have been solved by X-ray crystallography. Blundell explained that the chain folds into a flexible, circular 'cradle' like structure that can support the DNA double helix, with the ligation taking place inside. The mechanism requires proteins to work as 'stages, scaffolds and steps' to hold the complex together for repair, and his group has solved structures of many other components including the Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer that recognises and binds to the break, initiating the repair, and a nuclease named Artemis with 'a nice pocket for drug discovery'.

Two talks on structural biology as applied to drug discovery followed. The first was by Pamela Williams from Astex Pharmaceuticals, a company founded by Blundell with Harren Jhoti in 1999 that has just registered its first drug - a kinase inhibitor, Kisqali® (ribociclib) - for clinical use in breast cancer. Williams' talk highlighted another protein family that is just as important in pharmacology as the kinases: cytochromes P450. We have about 50 different P450 subtypes in our livers, and they catalyse reactions that modify drug molecules so they can be more easily removed from our bodies. A handful of these - the subtypes known as 1A9, 2C9, 2C19 and 3D6 - metabolise most prescription drugs. Human (and all eukaryotic) P450s are monotopic membrane proteins with flexible active sites, which allow them to bind a wide variety of substrates but which make the structures hard to solve. Williams' involvement with P450 structural biology began with the first mammalian structure, rabbit cytochrome 2C5, and she joined Astex from California to work on the first human structure, the subtype 2C9. This was published in 2003 (PDB 1OG2); a large number of other human structures have followed, yielding useful insights into drug metabolism.

Ben Bax, who studied for his PhD under Tom Blundell at Birkbeck, has just moved to the University of York after eighteen years at the pharma company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). His talk described work at GSK to determine the structures of bacterial DNA gyrases. These are members of a large class of enzymes called topoisomerases that catalyse topological transitions in DNA; the gyrase, which catalyses DNA supercoiling, is the target of the widely used quinolone family of antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin). However, quinolone resistance is increasing, mainly through mutations at specific amino acid positions of the target gyrase. GlaxoSmithKline is investing heavily in the development of novel gyrase inhibitors based on oligonucleotides, and Bax' structural biology group has contributed a large number of still unpublished structures of the enzyme with and without inhibitors or DNA bound to this work.

Janet Thornton, emeritus director of the European Bioinformatics Institute, is one of the best known figures in British bioinformatics. Her talk, on what she termed an 'accidental' paper, took the audience back to the basic principles of protein structure. In the late 70s, when she started her career, there were only about fifteen protein structures known but scientists were already examining those structures to determine characteristic patterns. Many of these first structures determined had major inaccuracies, and discovering and correcting these was a major task for early structural biologists. The Ramachandran Plot, now half a century old, was one of the first tools to be developed to gauge the quality of a protein structure, and it is still widely used. Thornton's 'accidental' (and very highly cited) paper described the program PROCHECK, which runs this and other checks on a structure to give a comprehensive assessment of its quality. A PROCHECK record for each structure in the PDB is linked from the database PDBsum.

The final talk provided delegates with a rare opportunity to hear a new Nobel Laureate - in this case, the Laboratory of Molecular Biology's own Richard Henderson - tell the story behind some of his ground-breaking research. Henderson shared the 2017 Chemistry Nobel, for "developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution", with Joachim Frank and Jacques Dubochet. He chose to talk about one structure that he had in some senses made his own: that of bacteriorhodopsin, a proton pump found in Archaea that captures light energy as photons and that has many structural and mechanistic similarities with the G-protein coupled receptors, although the exact evolutionary relationship is unclear. Henderson's studies of this important molecule started in the 1970s with structures that were just about detailed enough to show the cylindrical helices. It took him over 15 years'effort with collaborators in Berlin, Berkeley and elsewhere to improve the technology enough to solve the so-called 'phase problem' and obtain an atomic-resolution structure by electron diffraction. The rest, again, is history.

The 2017 ISMB Retreat

The Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (ISMB) at Birkbeck and UCL holds a conference each summer where all members of the Institute's constituent departments come together to discuss their research. In even years, this takes the form of the ISMB Symposium: two intense days of research talks from ISMB core members and invited research leaders. In odd years, the focus turns to the younger members of the Institute with the ISMB Retreat. This, usually held in Cambridge University's Robinson College, is a two-day residential event featuring plenaries from outside speakers, shorter talks by students and postdocs from the ISMB, an activity designed to get young researchers thinking about science-based careers outside an academic lab, and a poster session. The 2017 retreat, held on June 29 and 30, was the seventh in the series.

There is a full report of this retreat (written by me) with photos on the ISMB website. Do check it out! Here are just a few highlights that are relevant to students of structural biology.

The three keynote speakers were Lori Passmore (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB), Cambridge; Bill Rutherford (Imperial College, London); and Bart Vanhaesebroeck (UCL Cancer Institute). Structural biology was a feature of all three talks, although most prominently in Passmore's. She was recently appointed as a group leader at the LMB, where her group uses high resolution electron microscopy to study the process of poly-adenylation (link to PPS section 8): the addition of the 'poly-A tail' to newly synthesised messenger RNA molecules during the maturation process. Much of the work she discussed has still to be published, apart from a section on techniques development: a physicist in her group, Chris Russo, has worked with her to devise a novel, gold-based substrate for mounting specimens in the electron microscope that eliminates most specimen movement and thus increases resolution.

Bill Rutherford gave an engaging talk, unusually featuring hand-written slides, on the mechanism of action of photosystem II, one of the complex proteins involved in photosynthesis. The evolution of photosynthesis was responsible for the increase in oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere that made multicellular life possible, and Rutherford explained how the increase in oxygen had led to further changes in the structure and mechanism of the photosystem that had the overall effect of decreasing its efficiency. Bart Vanhaesebroeck's lecture, which ended the retreat, described the mechanism of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase family of proteins and their role in cancer. Inhibitors of these kinases (link to PPS section 5) might prove useful anti-cancer drugs, almost certainly as part of combination therapy.

The programme also included nine short talks by students and young postdocs. The excellent quality of these was highlighted by the judges of the best talk, who were unable to come to a consensus judgement. In the end, two equal prizes were given, to Jennifer Booker, who studies the structure of sodium channels (see e.g. this post from September 2016) in Bonnie Wallace's group at Birkbeck, and to Sapir Ofer, for a talk on her PhD studies of the structural and molecular biology of archaeal histones. Proteins in this family are responsible for packing DNA into the chromosomes of eukaryotic cells; bacteria pack DNA using an entirely different mechanism, but the mode of packing in archaea - single-celled organisms that have no nucleus and are defined as prokaryotes but are more closely related to eukaryotes than to bacteria - was unknown until recently.

The retreat always includes an activity to challenge ISMB students and postdocs to think about career opportunities beyond academic research, and this year's proved particularly popular. It was a Dragons' Den style competition in which the younger delegates were split into teams, assigned mentors and given an hour to create a fictitious life science company, develop a bid for funding and present this to a panel of 'dragons'. Three finalists were chosen to battle it out in front of the rest of the delegates. The competitors worked hard and all 'companies' produced ideas that held water to at least some extent, but there could be only one winner. That was a company named TerraNova, which presented an antibody-drug conjugate for primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Microtubules and Microscopes: Exploring the Cytoskeleton

Electron microscopist Carolyn Moores, the most recently appointed professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Birkbeck, gave her inaugural lecture at the college on June 1.

Moores arrived at Birkbeck in 2004 to start her research group and has risen rapidly and steadily up the academic ladder ever since. Introducing the lecture, the Master of Birkbeck, David Latchman, explained that Moores’ CV stood out in every way; she was clearly as gifted a teacher and administrator as she was a researcher. Furthermore, as she has won several awards for science communication, he predicted that the audience would be in for a treat. We were not disappointed.

Moores began her lecture by saying that she would talk about three different things: her own career development; her group’s research into the structure and function of microtubules; and the advancement of women in science, a cause that is close to her heart.

She remembered that she had wanted to work as a scientist as soon as she knew what a laboratory was, and she started young, as an intern in a research lab at Middlesex Hospital while still in the sixth form. School was followed by a BSc in Biochemistry at Oxford and a PhD in John Kendrick-Jones’ lab at the world-famous Laboratory for Molecular Biology (LMB) in Cambridge. She then moved to work as a post-doc with Ron Milligan at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, USA, and it was there that she began her studies on microtubules.

The award of a David Phillips research fellowship in 2004 gave her the opportunity to return to the UK as an independent researcher. She explained that there were three reasons – or more accurately three people – that led her to choose to come to Birkbeck. Working in electron microscopy, she was inspired by the work of Helen Saibil, one of the UK’s principal exponents of that technique; she had known Nicholas Keep, then a lecturer in Biological Sciences, as a friend since her time at the LMB; and she knew that she would value the interdisciplinary working environment of the Institute for Structural Molecular Biology under the ‘inspired’ leadership of Gabriel Waksman.

Moores then moved on to discuss the main topic of her group’s research: the three-dimensional structure, function and role in disease of tiny cylindrical structures known as microtubules. These are one of the building blocks of the cytoskeleton, which forms a framework for our cells in the same way that our skeletons form a framework for our bodies. They are about 25nm in diameter, which puts them firmly into the ‘nano-scale’ of biology that is easily studied using electron microscopy.

There is a cytoskeleton in every living cell, and it, and the microtubules that form it, are involved in many important cellular processes including shape definition, movement and cell division. Diseases as diverse as cancer, epilepsy, neurodegeneration and kidney disease have been linked to microtubule defects. Understanding their fundamental structure and function, as Moores’ group aims to, should help in understanding these disease processes and perhaps also in developing effective treatments.

Microtubules are built up from many copies of a small protein called tubulin, which, in turn, is a dimer of two similar proteins called alpha and beta tubulin. These tubulin dimers make contacts with each other both head-to-tail and side-to-side to create the cylindrical microtubule wall, fuelled by energy derived from the molecule GTP. Each tubulin unit has a definite “top” and a “bottom” and, as the units are oriented in parallel, so has the complete microtubule.

Microtubules are dynamic structures; they continue to grow by the addition of tubulin units to one end as long as GTP is available, and then begin to unravel and shrink. This dynamism, which allows them to respond to the changing needs of the cell, is essential for their function in healthy cells. In particular, microtubules organise chromosome structures during cell division and are therefore necessary for cell proliferation. As cancer is a disease of uncontrolled cell proliferation, it is possible to imagine that a molecule that could specifically block microtubule growth and assembly in the nucleus might be useful as an anti-cancer drug.

Moores and her group are aiming to understand the process of microtubule growth at as high resolution as possible, using electron microscopy. Unfortunately, however, the most detailed images can only be obtained if the specimen is at very low temperatures (in so-called cryo-elecron microscopy) and using this means that the dynamics of the specimens must be “frozen” into a still image. While it is now possible to see the individual tubulin subunits in the static microtubule images, many details of their structure can only be inferred from computational analysis.

Moores went on to describe one project in her lab in a little more detail. This was an investigation of the structure and role of proteins that bind only to growing microtubule ends, falling off when the growth stops. It is possible to obtain low-resolution images of microtubules in which these molecules have been made to fluoresce, so only growing microtubules are tracked.

In order to understand the growth process in detail, the group developed an analogue of the GTP “fuel” molecule which can bind to the tip of a microtubule that is extending but not break down to release its energy, so the microtubule does not in fact grow. This forms a static analogue of a growing microtubule that retains all the characteristics of the dynamic structure but that can be studied at low temperatures.

The binding site for End Binding protein 1 (highlighted in green) on the microtubule lattice at the corner of four tubulin dimers, visualised using cryo-electron microscopy
Image from Maurer et al. 2012, Cell 149(2):371-82. Full text here.

Images of this structure have shown that the end binding proteins bind at the corner of four of the tubulin units. They have explained a lot of the properties of growing microtubules, but there is still more to learn. A full understanding will need structures that are at even higher resolution, where the positions of individual atoms can be made out. Following many years of technical development, today’s most powerful electron microscopes are now making this possible.

In the last section of the lecture, Moores left the topic of research to talk briefly about another of her passions: the promotion of women in science. She explained that although 65% of under-graduates in the biological sciences are now women, the proportion of women drops to 40% at any academic grade and 25% for full professors.

A study cited by the European Molecular Biology Organisation has suggested that the barriers for women scientists to progress are set so high that at the current rate of progress full equality would never be achieved. Birkbeck has signed up to the Athena SWAN Charter, set up to encourage higher education institutions to transform their culture and promote gender equality. She described her work with the Athena SWAN team that has so far resulted in the college gaining a bronze award as being as exciting as, but also as challenging as, her studies of microtubules.

There is more information about the structure and function of microtubules on this page in section 7 of the PPS course. The technique of cryo-electron microscopy is covered in some detail in the second-year MSc module Techniques in Structural Molecular Biology.

Structural Secrets of an Ancient Viral Plague

Research in Biological Sciences at Birkbeck, and several related departments at neighbouring University College London, is combined into the Institute of Structural Molecular Biology. The Institute holds a regular seminar programme - every Wednesday lunchtime during termtime - in which it invites excellent scientists, many with links to the colleges, to present their research. A few weeks ago, the seminar speaker was an electron microscopist, Sarah Butcher, who is based at the University of Helsinki in Finland. Her group has been investigating the structure of a virus that causes a very well-known disease: measles.

Measles has been known of for millennia. The disease (although of course not its cause) was first described in ancient Egypt. It is one of the most infectious viruses known, but people who encounter measles (if at all) as an unpleasant childhood affliction are often surprised to learn that it is a killer. About 164,000 people lost their lives as a result of measles infection in 2008, most from lingering immunosuppression rather than the acute infection. Most deaths occur in Africa and south Asia; a smaller epidemics have recently arisen in the UK when the MMR vaccination lost popularity over the MMR autism scare.

The measles virus is a paramyxovirus; an enveloped virus with a single strand of RNA as its genome, and closely related to the viruses that cause mumps, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and para-influenza in infants and children. It has two surface proteins and iis thought to attach directly to the membranes of the cells it infects via one of these.

Until recently, structural studies of the measles virus have been fairly limited. Many groups have studied it using an electron microscopy technique called negative staining, but that can only see the virus' surface. Structures of one intact measles virus protein and domains of three others have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank; the haemagglutinin (e.g. PDB code 2RKC); two separate domains of the phosphoprotein (1OKS and 2K9D) and a structure of fragments of two proteins simply called P and N bound together (1T60).

Sarah Butcher and her group used a technique called cryo-electron microscopy, which allows the interior of viruses to be visualised, to study the measles virus. Their results led them to focus on the matrix protein, which is thought to be important for the assemby of the virus (the protein coloured cyan in the images below). All previous models had placed the matrix protein covering the inner part of the viral membrane. What the Butcher group saw, however, was completely different. They could see a protein surrounding parts of nucleocapsid - the viral RNA and its associated, protective protein - and further analysis identified this as the matrix protein. The matrix binds tightly to parts of the nucleocapsid to make rod-like structures, and these fold into anti-parallel units that are somewhat remniscent of antiparallel beta sheets in proteins. This model suggests that the process of virus replication will be more complex and yield more potential drug targets than has previously been thought.

Two models for the organisation of proteins and RNA in the measles virus. Top: the old model, with the matrix protein (cyan) surrounding the virus coat. Bottom: the Butcher group model, with the matrix protein surrounding parts of the nucleocapsid. Figure credit: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA (2011)

Structures of proteins from other viruses, particularly HIV and influenza, will be covered quite extensively later in the PPS course. We don't study the technique used in this study, cryo-electron microscopy, in PPS but it is covered in one of the options for the second year of the PPS course, Techniques in Structural Molecular Biolog